Case Study

A permitting system already existed. What it needed was a process.

A regional government agency responsible for payroll across multiple school districts was already stretched thin when we began mapping its operations. What emerged was a complete picture of the system, and a prioritized plan to fix it.

Share this case study

LinkedIn Email

Engagement at-a-glance

Industry:
Government
Organization size:
~500-1,000 employees
Services:
Business Operating Model Design
Operations & Process Improvement
The Challenge

The team wasn't short on effort. It was short on visibility.

Payroll touched dozens of interdependent processes spread across payroll, accounting, HR, and IT, with no one holding a full picture of how work actually moved between roles. The team was already working past a standard 40-hour week just to keep operations running, with no time or internal expertise left over to step back and map the system they were operating inside. The visible symptom was operational strain, but the core challenge was that the underlying systemic bottlenecks had never been defined or mapped.

  • Complexity with no single owner

    Payroll processes were spread across four functions, each with its own owners and handoffs, and no one had ever documented how the pieces connected end to end. Decisions about who did what were made informally, process by process, with nothing to fall back on when questions came up.

  • A team with no time to step back

    The payroll group was already working beyond a standard work week to keep current operations running. Stopping to diagnose the system risked falling further behind on the work itself, which meant the assessment had to happen without pulling the team away from its day job.

  • Delays with consequences beyond the department

    Payroll timing wasn't just an internal metric. It determined whether employees were paid accurately and on schedule, and whether benefits were processed without disruption. Continued inefficiency risked more than frustration inside the department, it risked morale and retention across the organization it served.

Our Approach

Understanding how the work actually moved before recommending how to fix it.

  • 1

    Scoped the engagement around a fixed three-month window

    Before starting, the team reviewed the original scoping work and built a plan for engaging every role connected to payroll, working backward from a fixed three-month timeline to budget the work.

  • 2

    Ran discovery sessions across every connected role

    The team met individually with more than 20 people across payroll, accounting, HR, and IT rather than working from assumptions about how the department operated. Each conversation covered what the role actually did, what worked, and what didn't.

  • 3

    Built current-state process maps for every workflow

    Over a month was spent mapping 23 distinct payroll processes, from timesheet submission to leave and termination, documenting the specific tasks, systems, and handoffs behind each one.

  • 4

    Identified gaps and prioritized a future-state plan

    A gap analysis translated the findings into 83 specific remediations, sorted by what could be implemented quickly versus what required more time or investment, and paired with future-state maps showing what the redesigned process should look like.

Value Delivered

A system that finally understands itself.

Mapped every payroll process end to end

Twenty-three individual process maps, plus one master roadmap showing how work moved across payroll, accounting, HR, and IT, replaced a system no one had ever seen documented in full.

Prioritized fixes by effort and impact

Recommendations were sorted into quick-win, intermediate, and extended-term work, giving leadership a sequence to act on rather than an undifferentiated list of problems.

Left a roadmap the team could act on alone

The future-state maps and prioritized remediation plan were built to be picked up and implemented by the organization's own team, without requiring another outside assessment to get started.

Built recommendations around how the team actually worked

By meeting individually with every person on the payroll team before mapping a single process, the recommendations reflected how the organization actually operated rather than a solution ported in from another client.

Results that reflect the work behind them.

3 month

Full assessment, gap analysis, and future-state redesign delivered start to finish

20+

Individuals interviewed across payroll, accounting, HR, and IT

83

Process improvements identified and prioritized for implementation

Related Insights

Case Study
Execution Healthcare

A stronger PMO that scaled with the organization.

Read more
Resource
Execution Financial Services and Insurance

Insurance innovation, bring new products to market with purpose

Read more
Resource
Execution

Complex system implementations, deliver the outcomes you planned for

Read more
See all insights & perspectives
Work With Us

The firms that move fastest don’t wait for clarity. They create it.

We help leadership teams cut their ambiguity, align around what matters, and build the momentum to transform their business.

Let's talk