We help leadership teams cut their ambiguity, align around what matters, and build the momentum to transform their business.
Why actuarial transformation succeeds, or stalls
The organizations getting real value from AI aren’t the ones who moved fastest. They’re the ones who did the harder work first.
ABOUT THIS FEATURE
Actuarial transformation looks like a technology project on the surface, new cloud platforms, new tools, faster data processing. In this piece for Contingencies, Tony Schweiss and Anderson Olson argue that what actually determines success is leadership: specifically, whether someone with real authority can unite actuarial and IT teams, who tend to think about risk in fundamentally different ways, behind a shared vision. They walk through what that leadership looks like in practice, illustrated by a real transformation engagement.
WHAT THIS ARTICLE EXPLORES
Why actuaries and IT teams clash even when both are doing their jobs well
The different instincts each function brings to risk and control, and why that tension has to be resolved deliberately rather than assumed away.
The three things effective leadership has to establish
From naming the right executive champion to building the business case, the specific groundwork that has to happen before any system gets replaced.
A real transformation that cut a three-day task down to hours
How one national insurer automated a core piece of actuarial workflow, and what made the technical win possible in the first place.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Tags
Related insights
Case Study
A stronger PMO that scaled with the organization.
Read more
Case Study
One dashboard replaced hundreds of disconnected reports.
Read more
Case Study